Gender: October 2008 Archives

fisherpricedollhouse.jpgA little while back, I gave away the boys' Fisher-Price dollhouse to my niece, who will be two in March. Liam had seen this dollhouse at a friend's house when he was about two, fallen in love with it, and so miraculously, Santa brought it to him.

There were a few other things that I passed along to my niece that made me sad - parting with the little wooden stove and all the dishes, for instance (that stove and Liam's three-year obsession with pots, pans, and cooking is a story for another day) - but giving away the dollhouse didn't bother me.

The ads for this dollhouse claim it as "a girl's first dollhouse..." If you put batteries in this house, you get noises: "with the phone ringing, the kitchen timer dinging and much more, this friendly Fisher-Price home is full of activity." Given that level of dinging and ringing, sounds like there should have been a "girl's first martini" in the box, too.

What I found particularly galling about this house - into which we never put batteries, duh - were the figures that came with it. Not the Fisher-Price wooden dowels with bowling-ball shaped heads and plastic hair of my youth. I guess too many kids swallowed those.  No, instead the house came with "realistic" molded plastic figures, squat and pink, too big to fit in all but the greediest of mouths. 

The inhabitants of this pink-roofed, faux-Victorian dream house are probably molded in the same pressurized chamber (they are essentially the same shape) but they are finished with a clear eye towards who does what: Daddy, with brown hair and a sweater vest, holds a cellphone, and resembles either a television evangelist or a dot.com dude who made millions and is quasi-retired. Mommy, also brown-haired, wears a cardigan and holds ... a baby-bottle. Note the separation of fiefdoms in this picture from the FP website: Dad upstairs on the computer, Mom downstairs ... in the kitchen. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose, eh? 

fppeople.jpg
Perhaps I shouldn't have let my niece have the doll-house; maybe instead I should've roamed on ebay for that paragon of alternative doll families, The Sunshine Family.  When I was a little girl, I loved the Sunshines: the mom wore a long calico dress and sandals; the baby was blonde and indeterminately sexed; dad had tan pants, workboots, and a red turtleneck - a sure sign of a counterculture lifestyle (they probably smoked a little weed when the baby was sleeping). I'm sure they lived in the woods outside Boulder or maybe Berkeley.

sunshines.jpgYou could also get the Happy Family, who were the Sunshines' black neighbors, and even, eventually, Sunshine grandparents. I find myself deeply curious about the marketing meeting that produced that: "the Sunshines are a big seller....let's make old people!"  But hey, it was the mid-seventies, with its peculiar brand of "Free to be ... You and Me" idealism.


freetobe.jpg 
I'm not saying that Mrs. Fisher-Price is a plastic version of Ibsen's Nora, or that my niece will be brainwashed by a two-inch man holding a cell phone; I guess I'm asking if it's possible to escape their faux-Victorian conventionality.

Maybe we all should go live in the woods with the Sunshines. 



clariceandrudolph.jpgClarice here is not Clarice Starling with her good bag and cheap shoes (or was it good shoes and cheap bag, that hissed insult from Hannibal Lecter), but the original Clarice -- the literally doe-eyed friend of Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer.

I remembered Clarice after we saw Circus Amok last weekend because in our house, Clarice-the-deer is not the hyper-feminized bashful herbivore she is in the world of Rankin & Bass. Liam made her something else...

Last fall, for Liam's birthday, we went to midtown with three of his friends, who have developed a tradition of going to Build-A-Bear Workshop for their birthdays. Why it's become such a fixture with them, none of us can understand, but it's easy and relatively painless as an outing, if you can resist the endless rows of bear-friendly accessories (wildly over-priced, just like accessories in the real world).

Liam spent long minutes perusing all his choices and then chose Clarice.

But then ... what should Clarice wear?

The decision? Apparently, Clarice plays for the New York Rangers: blue plush pants, Rangers jersey, little blue pillbox "helmet" that sits awkwardly on top of Clarice's permanently affixed red-and-white polka-dot bow.

The checkout clerk held up Liam's creation to the other clerks and said "I've never seen this before."

001.JPG

Given the almost endless permutation of ensembles available at BBW, it seems rather remarkable that Liam is the first to put together this combination. At Build-A-Bear, you can find every sports team, rock-n-roll, hip-hop, construction workers ... You can even buy full combat uniforms for all branches of the military - with one significant omission, as one of Liam's friends discovered: "WHERE ARE THE GUNS?" he bellowed. 

And it's not a bad question, really. I mean, if you're going to sell Army bears, Marine bears, SEAL bears, Air Force bears ... why not be completely honest about what you're selling? Why is it okay to sell fatigues and uniforms from all branches of the armed services and yet sidestep the one thing that all these uniforms have in common?

If we all have the right to bear arms, why isn't it all right to arm bears?

Clarice, by the way, had a wonderful season with the Rangers and will be starting at forward this year.

I think Jennifer Miller would approve.



 

IMG_1920.JPGCircus Amok brought its chaotic carnival to city parks again this past September, culminating in two performances in Tompkins Square Park, that former battleground in Manhattan's never-ending gentrification wars (remember the riots of the late 1980s?). Gentrification won, of course, which is why King Tut's Wa-Wa Hut no longer stands at the corner of 6th and A, and why I can't afford to shop in the precious wee clothing boutiques that dot Avenue B.

But I digress.  The Circus was in town and as always it was a splendid mashup of burlesque, slapstick, acrobatics, and deeply political satire. All ringmastered - excuse me - ringmistressed by Jennifer Miller, who is not a bearded lady, but a lady with a beard.

Liam and Caleb wanted to know if she is a lady or a man and if the beard is real - questions that everyone else was thinking about too, I'm sure - along with other, perhaps more prurient questions that my boys haven't quite glommed onto (yet). Yes, I say to Liam and Caleb, she's a lady, and yes, she has a beard.

That answer satisfies their curiosity and they settle back to watch the men in tutus, the African American "Dorothy" (in a blonde afro wig, natch), maniacal tumblers, and Jennifer herself, devilishly juggling what look like razor-sharp machetes.

What do they see, I wondered, watching them watch the juggling. Is it just juggling and funny clowns and the faint fear that Jennifer's sharp knives will slip out of her fingers and go slicing towards the front row of the audience?

Are they in any way feeling the message of gender outlawry that pervades Circus Amok?  Could the anarchic street theater of Jennifer Miller's circus help loosen the net of gender conventions that - all of our best intentions notwithstanding - ensnare us all, more or less? 

Here's an example: last spring, I took the boys to a family reunion of sorts, in Florida, where they had a great week romping around with all kinds of cousins and aunts and uncles.  On the second-to-last day of our visit, two girl cousins, both about ten years old, gave Caleb and Liam full mani-pedis.  The boys got the complete treatment: sparkly colors, little dots of decoration, tiny painted flowers - as elaborate as Hindu brides.  Beautiful.  And they loved it! Waved their fingers around, wiggled their toes, showed off to all and sundry.

These are Liam's fingers - sorry about the inadvertent product-placement for Dibs -

IMG_1249crop.jpgBut after we got home, on the Sunday before Liam was due back at school, I wondered whether I should stick to my progressive guns and allow my second-grade boy to go off to school with his manicure intact or strip the polish off in deference to the unwritten rule that boys don't have painted fingernails.

I caved. Off came the silver flowers, off came the purple sparkles. 

I hated giving in to convention but I didn't want him to be teased (he's got enough problems, given that he's the smallest kid - boy or girl - in his grade).  We decided to leave his toenails painted, however - but sure enough, that week at karate, a couple of boys gave him grief for his decorated tootsies.

Before I became the mother of boys, I used to think that gender codes wrapped mostly tightly around women - and probably that is, in fact, the truth. But as I watch Liam and Caleb grow up, I'm increasingly reminded that there are lots of rules about being a boy, too - and that those rules constrict just as tightly.

Jennifer Miller and her troupe smash the rules with gleeful abandon; inside their ring, it doesn't matter who sleeps with whom, who has a beard, whose toes sparkle. It only matters that when you do a head-first swan dive off the shoulders of the burly (wo)man in the gold spangly dress...someone is there to catch you when you fall.

IMG_1902.JPG



Tag Cloud

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Gender category from October 2008.

Gender: December 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.